Micro-evolution and Macro-evolution
Change over time, micro-evolution, within one species, is undisputed. But macro-evolution, one species to a new species, has no evidence.
Homology, the universality of DNA
Homology, that all species have DNA, proves a common designer, not a common ancestor. Dawkins is guilty of circular reasoning, because he has predetermined to exclude a common designer. Many scientists look at the evidence with polar glasses, never considering intelligent design, so cannot interpret the evidence correctly.
Gradualism in the fossil record?
The fossil record shows no gradualism. Most all the phyla suddenly appear in the Cambrian stratum, without precursors.
Experiments on E-Coli bacteria, over enough generations to make it equivalent to 1 million years of human generations, could not break the bacteria out of its own species. Only variations of the same species.
As for transitional phyla, 99 of every 1,000 frames is cut out of the movie, according to National Geographic. There are not missing links, but missing chains. Well, the chain simply does not exist.
Make a list of species to which there are no other similar species whatsoever, either in the present or in the previous to them. Such species are numerous.
Science does not say evolution is true; scientists say it is true.